The economic hit men
Najma
Sadeque
In
late 2004, an unusual book appeared in the US. It was written by an economist
and business management expert, but it was nothing about text-book economics
and business. Far from it. It was about breaking all the rules for good business
and economics but becoming fabulously wealthy anyway. It was an autobiography
- since the writer was a key perpetuator - but also an expose about the global
dirty tricks of the past four decades of the unaccountable government within
the government in whose pay he was.
The book was also a confession, because rather late in life, he one day suddenly
faced up to the enormity of his inexcusable actions after viewing the consequences
of the strategies of those he served. He had been too immersed too long in
the heady rewards for what he did that included all that most believed only
existed in James Bond and similar novels and movies. He did have occasional
twinges of conscience and as many as four different occasions he would start
writing his expose for publication, but he also had a big mouth and talked
about what he wanted to do to a few key people so that each time he would
be heavily bribed not to do it. On one occasion he was given half a million
dollars and a paid position that required him to do no work. It came from
his previous employer; the private engineering-consulting firm which worked
abroad for the US government and later, closed down and re-emerged under a
new name. But on that fateful September 11, something drove him to the site
of the smouldering remains of the World Trade Tower with unknown thousands
buried under the heap.
After that there was no turning back. The economist-turned-writer's name was
John Perkins. Since he wanted the book to be read widely, including by ordinary
citizens who mistakenly believed that their country was the greatest bastion
of democracy, he wrote it in the style of a novel. It was called "Confessions
of an Economic Hit Man". Once it was complete, though, he had difficulty
finding a publisher. The truth written up in black and white seemed to implicate
too many, too far and wide, including those who did not know their actions
were being used for what was illegitimate and in violation of all international
laws and human rights. He himself approached a top publishing house; but it
was owned by a major international corporation, and they didn't want people
reading such material that would make any and every company working in foreign
countries, suspect, even if they were innocent. He was asked to fictionalise
it, but he refused, because that would be defeating his objective.
Finally, it was a small, family-owned publishing house, Berret-Koehler, that
courageously came to the rescue. But the hurdles didn't end with its printing.
To be read, people had to know about its existence, which came mainly through
book reviews. But the mainstream American press which is entirely corporate-owned,
would not touch it. However, the alternative, smaller media did; so did activist
groups working for economic justice and democracy that made full use of the
Internet - and word of it spread. Within months 150,000 copies were sold and
went into several reprints to become a best-seller; even the leading American
newspapers could no longer ignore it, appearing as it did in over twenty best-selling
lists, which in spurred greater sales. It was to shock most readers.
What exactly an 'economic hit man' - or EHM for short - is best defined in
Perkin's own words - "Economic hit men are highly paid professionals
who cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars. Their tools
include fraudulent financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs, extortion,
sex, and murder."
In other words, the aggressors - whether corporations or superpower or both
- have become more sophisticated in their methods. They do not start off with
intimidation by military force or private armies - that is the final stage
when all else fails. Instead well-educated, intelligent but greedy and corruptible
professionals are used. That included justifying World Bank loans channelising
money into the pockets of huge U.S. contractors (which included the notorious
Bechtel and Halliburton companies in which the Bush father-and-son have personal
stakes). It also included making false, highly-inflated economic forecasts
to build unnecessarily huge and excessively expensive projects that countries
would supposedly benefit from - funded by the World Bank - and which weak
governments were forced to accept because they came from 'foreign experts'.
"We build a global empire," writes Perkins, "We are an elite
group of men and women who utilise international financial organisations to
foment conditions that make other nations subservient to the corporatocracy
running our biggest corporations, our government, and our banks. Like our
counterparts in the Mafia, EHMs provide favours. These take the form of loans
to develop infrastructure electric generating plants, highways, ports, airports,
or industrial parks. A condition of such loans is that engineering and construction
companies from our own country must build all these projects. In essence,
most of the money never leaves the United States; it is simply transferred
from banking offices in Washington to engineering offices in NY, Houston,
or San Francisco."
"Despite the fact that the money is returned almost immediately to corporations
that are members of the corporatocracy (the creditor), the recipient country
is required to pay it all back, principal plus interest. If an EHM is completely
successful, the loans are so large that the debtor is forced to default on
its payments after a few years. When this happens, then like the Mafia we
demand our pound of flesh. This often includes one or more of the following:
control over United Nations votes, the installation of military bases, or
access to precious resources such as oil. Of course, the debtor still owes
us the money and another country is added to our global empire."
But that is exactly what activists and independent academics (including some
who have resigned in outraged from the World Bank and IMF) and civil society
organisations have been saying all along! That's what urban protestors and
peasant movements all over the world have been asking their governments to
recognise. That's a major part of what their anger was about at the WTO meetings
in Seattle, in Cancun, in Doha, and most recently in Hong Kong; not because
they were among a disgruntled, incompetent minority who were resentful because
they were not successful and wanted ready-made benefits from the state, as
the mainstream media made them out to be.
Their message was that if a country was prevented from being owner of its
own natural resources and had no control over how it's economy was run, and
was being controlled from outside, how could citizens benefit? Whichever country
the US got involved in invariably ended in poverty, hunger, devastation and
decline. In reality, World Bank, IMF and the WTO were all creatures of the
United States and the major American corporations that did not just determine
who would get loans and who would do business with which country; loans were
a policy that were perpetuated to keep countries in a state of permanent debt
and dependency so that investors could exploit with impunity until there was
nothing left, and the country would be abandoned. Perkin writes:
"The subtlety of this modern empire building puts the Roman centurions,
the Spanish conquistadors, and the 18th and 19th-century European colonial
powers to shame. We 'EHMs' are crafty; we learned from history. Today we do
not carry swords. We do not wear armour or clothes that set us apart. In countries
like Ecuador, Nigeria, and Indonesia, we dress like local schoolteachers and
shop owners. In Washington and Paris, we look like government bureaucrats
and bankers. We appear humble, normal. We visit project sites and stroll through
impoverished villages. We profess altruism, talk with local papers about the
wonderful humanitarian things we are doing. We cover the conference tables
of government committees with our spreadsheets and financial projections,
and we lecture at the Harvard Business School about the miracles of Macro-
economics. We are on the record, in the open. Or so we portray ourselves and
so are we accepted. It is how the system works. We seldom resort to anything
illegal because the system itself is built on subterfuge, and the system is
by definition legitimate."
"However, and this is a very large caveat, if we fail, an even more sinister
breed steps in, ones we 'EHMs' refer to as the jackals, men who trace their
heritage directly to those earlier empires. The jackals are always there,
lurking in the shadows. When they emerge, heads of state are overthrown or
die in violent accidents. And if by chance the jackals fail, as they failed
in Afghanistan and Iraq, then the old models re-surface. When the jackals
fail, young Americans are sent in to kill and to die." Echoes of Iraq
and Afghanistan?
Perkins operated in all the resource-rich countries, as well as those that
were strategically important for the US - among them, Indonesia, Panama, Ecuador,
Columbia, Saudi Arabia, and Iran. For the layman, and especially for those
who are not into reading many books, Perkins' narrative lays out a frightening
clear and easy-to-understand picture of how institutions without conscience
or humanity, operate in the global arena under the guise of banking, trade
and investment.
Preparing Perkins was not done in a hurry but part of a long-term, well-crafted
plan. He was recruited in the late sixties when he was still a student in
business school, by the National Security Agency which he says is far larger
than the CIA. In a radio interview on the activist-run American radio and
Internet media run, 'Democracy Now!', Perkins described :
"They (the National Security Agency) ran me through a series of tests
- personality tests, lie detector tests - very sensitive barrage of testing.
And during that process, they discovered that I would be a great candidate
for an economic hit man
. I have weaknesses that are pretty typical of
our culture, the three big drugs of our culture: money, power and sex. And
they discovered these weaknesses in me
. Then they encouraged me to go
into the Peace Corps. I lived in Ecuador for three years as a Peace Corps
volunteer with indigenous people there, who today are at war with the oil
companies. We were starting that process then, so I got some very good on-the-job
training, so to speak
.. When I got out of the Peace Corps, I went to
work for (the recruiter's) company in Boston, Charles T. Main, and went through
an extensive training programme there with a remarkable woman
.. she
was extremely intelligent, extremely sharp, extremely seductive. She benefited
from all the tests that I'd gone through, knew my weaknesses
.. she,
first of all, hooked me into becoming an economic hit man and at the same
time, warned me that this is a very dirty business and you must be completely
committed to it or you shouldn't take your first assignment."
"Well, really, over the past 30 to 40 years, we economic hit men have
created the largest global empire in the history of the world. And we do this,
typically - well, there are many ways to do it, but a typical one is that
we identify a Third World country that has resources, which we covet. In any
case, we go to that Third World country and we arrange a huge loan from the
international lending community; usually the World Bank leads that process.
So, let's say we give this Third World country a loan of $1 billion. One of
the conditions of that loan is that the majority of it, roughly 90%, comes
back to the United States to one of our big corporations. And those corporations
build in this Third World country large power plants, highways, ports, or
industrial parks - big infrastructure projects that basically serve the very
rich in those countries. The poor people in those countries and the middle
class suffer; they don't benefit from these loans, they don't benefit from
the projects. In fact, often their social services have to be severely curtailed
in the process of paying off the debt. Now what also happens is that this
Third World country then is saddled with a huge debt that it can't possibly
repay".
"For example, today, Ecuador's foreign debt, as a result of the economic
hit man, is equal to roughly 50% per cent of its national budget. It cannot
possibly repay this debt, as is the case with so many Third World countries.
So, now we go back to those countries and say, look, you borrowed all this
money from us, and you owe us this money, you can't repay your debts, so give
our oil companies your oil at very cheap costs. And in the case of many of
these countries, that means destroying their (environment) and destroying
their indigenous cultures. That's what we're doing today around the world,
and we've been doing it - it began shortly after the end of World War II.
It has been building up over time until today where it's really reached mammoth
proportions where we control most of the resources of the world."
But 'Confessions of an Economic Hit Man' isn't just meant to be read by the
minority of activists and concerned citizens. It is the business and industrial
communities of developing countries who hold the key to resistance by deciding
whether they want to become dispensable pawns - because no one is safe once
one's purpose has been served - or whether they want to work legitimately
in their own company and country. The book came to Pakistan but was not promoted
as a 'must-read.' It has already become recommended reading for activists
worldwide. It should be the same for people in commerce. The details are chilling
which brings the thought: "This could happen to me too. Better read late
than never".